Thursday, February 28, 2008
PhD - Administrative of Respondents
3rd Group.
Abd Halim Sulaiman, Abd Rizal Razali, Zamri Nawi, Elias Hamid, Abdullah Yahya, Samsudin Zakaria, Mohd Faizal Yusof, Ahmad Lotfi Haris, Ku Aswat Ku Adnan, Mohd Zulaffandi Abdulah, Syed Izzuddin Syed Jaladin, Iswandi Idris, Azaudin Adzmin, Mohd Zaidi Abdullah, Hayrul Nizam Dahalan, Salizal Mohamad Razali, Shaiful Shahril Norajoa, M Yusri Pardi, Wan Mohd Azmi, Mohd Faizal Mat Ali, Rahimah Abdul Hamid, Salwa Masdar, Naslina Mohamad Nasir, Norliakazimi Noordin, Zamzurani Ani, Norhaida Mohamad Sani, Norsyawaliza Md Nasir, Suzanawati Sofian, Rosilawati Mohd Ghazin, Norhamsah, Norakma Nawawi, Wan Naimah, Ramaizai Ramli, Molinda Abd Rahman.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Administrative of Questionnaire - 21 Feb 2008 Kali ke-7
.jpg)
Discussion - Developed questionnare, administrative activities:
Kali ke-1 : 23 Nov 2007 (Jumaat)
Kali ke-2 :4 Dis 2007 (Selasa)
Kali ke-3 :19 Dis 2007 (Rabu)
Kali ke-4 :16 Jan 2008 (Rabu)
Kali ke-5 :28 Jan 2008 (Isnin)
Kali ke-6 :6 Feb 2008 (Rabu)
Respondents:
Ibrahim Ahmad, Kamaludin Tomiran, Ruminah Md Zain, Abdullah Muhamad, Romales, Nor Asmah, Ros Maria, Sariah, Rosliza, Hafiz, Liyana, Tong, Shiadri, Mohd Helmi, Mohd Rashidi, Ahmad Shukri, Nazilah, Abdul Hafiz, Ashraf, Melor: 20 Respondents.
Friday, February 15, 2008
Republic Polytechnic
REPUBLIC POLYTECHNIC
Date: 15 February 2008
1. Prof Low Teck Seng (Principal/CEO of RP)
2. Dr W. A. M. Alwis Deputy Principal (Academic Affairs)
3. Hong Kok Hsien Manager (Network)
4. Jason Tey Manager (International Marketing)
Campus
Learning Hub
262 Labs
264 Seminar Rooms
Library with a seating capacity for 2,100
The Republic Cultural Central
1,200 seater auditorium
400 seater Theatre
Sport Complex
Tennis, badminton, baseball, street soccer, volleyball, netball, table tennis & sepak takraw, swimg pool etc
Food Court
Three food courts with a total seating capacity of 2400
Introduction
PBL Learning Process
1. One-Day-One-Problem – integrated and multidisciplinary
2. Three meetings for each problem
Goals Meeting (identification of learning issues)
Teach Meeting (sharing knowledge gathered with group mates)
Elaboration/Feedback Meeting (presentation of solutions and feedback). After a short period for group reflection a short quiz is conducted to test each individual’s progress with learning.
3. In between meetings, students communicate with each other in the group, search for information, ask for help, etc.
4. A reflection Journal by each student for each problem is required. These report shall
demonstrate how the student has synthesised information/material learned from other members of the group.
Project Based Modules
1. Each module: 16 full-days One-Day-One-Problem on full-time basis – 4 MC weightage
2. Class size = 25 students; 5 teams of 5 each
3. One facilitator per class, full day, 3 meetings
4. Lab work included in daily problems
5. Daily assessment by facilitators (16 per module)
6. Four Understanding Test (UT) per module
7. Final module grade based on daily assessment and Understanding Test grade.
Managing Human Resource
1. Introduce innovative HR practices
Outsourcing of administrative processes to home-based works
Hot-desking ; & Telecommuting
2. Maintain a lean and agile administrative work force
Admin Staff to Student Ratio
RP --------------------------------- 1:52
Acad Staff to Student Ratio
RP ---------------------------------- 1:18
3. More conductive working environment through increased mobility
Staff can work anywhere
4. AARP – Referral of suitable candidates for appointment as Acad Associates by staff;
5. WoW! – Monthly employee recognition and award program;
6. MediFlex – Allows RP staff more flexibility in taking care of their medical needs.
Acedemic Staff Roles
1. Facilitators
2. Problem Cafters
3. Module Chair
4. Programme Chair
ATMI
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Pro3 Based Learning: POLMAN
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Topic of PhD
The integration of National Occupational Skills Standards (NOCC) into the NDTS in Malaysia
Mohamad Sulaiman
Changing in professional profiles of coaches in Malaysia: The implementation of NDTS in Malaysia and its impact on the professional tasks of industry personnel commissioned with training
Ghalip Spahat
The role of learning organization in DSD to enhance the implementation of NDTS in Malaysia
Mohd Yazid bin Awalludin
Generic skills in the NDTS: implications on institutions and industry
Kamaludin bin Tomiran
Participation SME in NDTS
Mohd Yusof bin Abu Bakar
The development of a new curriculum framework for the NDTS in Malaysia
Azmi bin Ahmad
The effectiveness of learning transfer in NDTS
Ramli Rashidi
The framework for effective collaboration between public training institution and industry in the NDTS environment in Malayasia
Ruminah bt Mohd Zain
The development of assessment framework for VET programs in the National Occupational Skill Standard (NOSS) based training system and the NDTS based training system
Norlela Mustapha
The readiness levels of vocational training institution in Malaysia for the implementation the NDTS
Pn Aruna bt Ismail
Development of Employee Malaysia Skill Certification (MSC) Through Work Experience Framework For NDTS in Malaysia
En Shamsudin bin Jamil
Problems And Prospects Of E-Learning In
Malaysia Vocational Education And Training (Focusing On Courses In NDTS)
En Mahazani bin Ali
Developing the K-Based
Human Resources That Support the Implementation of the NDTS:
Measurement of Instructor’s Competency Levels at MARA Training Institutions
En Mohd Faizal bin Tokeran
The Integration of Learning Methodology Component in NDTS Curriculum
Pn Suzilasahibatul Akhmar bt Ahmad
Development of trainer's research and innovation skill in NDTS environment
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Reliability and Validity
Internal Reliability:
Interrelated each items
External Reliability:
Measured by other researcher, will give same result
Validity:
1. Check by 4 experts
2. Produce model
3. Purpose for all, nor random sampling
Face Validity:
Language - expert of English (1 persons)
NDTS, LO etc - understand
Content Validity:
Theory - to what extend
Gagasan
Active verb:
We invite CEO's companies for discussion
Passive verb:
CEO's of companies are invited for discussion
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Cognitive Apprenticeship
Dimension
content (4)
Knowledge of facts and terms
learning strategies
problem solving strategies
control strategies
methods (7)
modelling of excellence
articulation
coaching
reflection
scaffolding
exploration
fading
sequence (3)
increasing complexitiy
increasing diversity
global before local skills
sociology (5)
situated learning
exploiting cooperation
culture of expert practice
exploiting competition
intrinsic motivation
Learning Organization: Garvin, Senge
Systematic problem solving:
Experimentation with new approaches:
Learning from their own experiences and past history:
Learning from the experiences and best practices of others: enthusiastic borrowing.
Transferring knowledge quickly and efficiently throughout the organization: reports, tours, personnel rotation programs, training programs.
Transforming the formal system at a corporation into a Learning Organization will create the environment needed for the human system to thrive and will give the firm unmatched competitive advantage. As part of this process, the corporation needs to forget its old ways to make room for the new. The entire corporation's ecosystem needs to become one huge classroom. Effective feedback mechanisms need to be created and deployed that enable new ideas to be continually absorbed so that the best of them can be turned into action or new products and services.
Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS)
Job Characteristics Theory
Job characteristics theory is the most accepted framework for explaining relationships between job characteristics and outcomes (Glick, Jenkins BE Gupta, 1986; Griffin, 1987). The premise of this theory is that objective characteristics of individuals’ jobs primarily determine individuals’ perceptions of and responses to tasks (Hackman & Oldham, 1976, 1980; Fried & Ferris, 1987). But, in much of the job characteristics literature, the job characteristics are those characteristics as perceived by the worker. These perceived job characteristics are directly influenced by objective characteristics. But according to the theory, what is important is how the job is perceived, not what the job is objectively.
Cronbach's Alpha
Move the cursor to the Statistics option on the menu bar at the top of the screen.
On the menu under Statistics, click on the word Scale.
On the side menu, click on Reliability Analysis
For example, you might believe that Var0001, Var0005, and Var0009 all measure the same construct and you could combine a subject's response to those variables.
You need to inform the program of which variables you are considering combining. Each of your variables will be listed in the box on the left side of the screen.
You would continue step 5 for each of the variables you wish to use. In this example, you would repeat step 5 for Var0005 and Var0009.
Move the cursor to the Statistics button and press the mouse button once.
Because you would like to have the means for your variables printed, you click on the box in front of Means in the Summaries section.
It is also useful to see how each variables influences the reliability. For this reason you click on the box in front of the Scale if item deleted in the Descriptives for section.
Click on the Continue button.
Click on the OK button to run Cronbach's Alpha reliability.
Cronbach’s Alpha Interpretatiom
Reliability
0.90 and above
Excellent reliability at the level of the best standardized tests
0.80 - 0.90
Very good for a classroom test
0.70 - 0.80
Good for a classroom test; in the range of most. Few items which could be improved.
0.60 - 0.70
Somewhat low. Needs to be supplemented by other measures to determine grades. There are probably some items which could be improved.
0.50 - 0.60
Suggests need for revision of test, unless it is quite short. The test definitely needs to be supplemented by other measures for grading.
0.50 or below
Questionable reliability. This test should not contribute heavily to the course grade, and it needs revision.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Pengurusan Soal Selidik
Aktiviti yang dijalankan pada 6 Febuari 2008 di Bilik Wawasan, Jabatan Pembangunan Kemahiran (JPK), Putrajaya. Seramai 38 pegawai telah terlibat seperti berikut : Abd Halim, Anisah, Nor Azlina, Melor, Huda, Rosniza, Haslina, Samsuri, Md. Liza, Ismail, Arifin, Hisyam, Lily, Maizatul, Khadijah, Linda, Dalima, Hj. Sanusi, Syed Hamdan, Zool Helmi, Tg. Rozanita, Syarizan, Norizan, Hazizol, M. Nasir, Zul Helmi, Nizam, Wan Nazamudin, Siti Fauziah, Kamarun, Herwardi, Roslan, Muzafar, Zaidah, Fazli, dan Nawi.
Setiap responden mengambil masa selama 1 jam 30 minit untuk menjawab 135 soalan.
Elias Awad
Saya telah mengambil beliau bagi proses validasi questionnare bagi research yang bertajuk 'The Role of Learning Organization in DSD to Enhance NDTS'.
Halaman Pertama
Saya ingin mengucapkan selamat berblog di ghalipsemenyih. Mulakan tahun 2008 atau 1429 dengan azam untuk lebih cemerlang. Penuhi kehidupan dengan warna-warni aktiviti yang membawa kebaikan kepada manusia sejagat.
Wasslam.
ghalipsemenyih